What is the concept of Manual Testing?
The practice of manually assessing software for its functionality and performance by test engineers is known as manual testing. It is an established practice that predates the mainstreaming of software development. Early on, developers acted as their own test engineers. However, throughout time, the significance of quality assurance increased substantially, and test engineers became an essential component of every software development activity. In this blog post, we’ll look at how the process of manual testing plays a crucial role in developing robust software applications.
Table of Contents
Why manual testing is crucial in software development?
Manual testing is important in software development because there is no one size fits approach all when it comes to software testing. Although the effectiveness of automated testing cannot be disputed, manual testing’s intuition and inventiveness add a special value. Consider a tester taking on the role of an end-user and imagining various circumstances that a script would not foresee. It will try to come as near as possible, but there will inevitably be tricky bugs that evade their detection. Here, the role of human element enters at this point. Even the most advanced automated tests may miss some unforeseen bugs, but manual testers have a flair for finding them because they are not perfect, just like the rest of us.
How manual testing is performed in software development process?
To provide thorough and professional testing, several manual testers typically set up their workflow as follows:
Requirement Analysis: To have a successful QA process, manual testers must become familiar with the criteria. They can comprehend the software’s goal, operating principles, primary functions, and any weaknesses as a result. Using this knowledge, testers may create excellent test cases that find more flaws. In this situation, manual testers should be more creative and consult various sources of knowledge to understand how an application ought to function.
Designing Test Cases: Manual testers begin to create test cases using various test design methodologies as soon as they are familiar with the project requirements. As they provide the sequential stages for a specific function or scenario testing, test cases are utilised as instructions for manual testers. They ought to be thorough. As a result, other testers will be able to run your tests without needing to ask for clarification. Some manual testers still store their test cases in an Excel spreadsheet. However, several case management tools are available; they may greatly ease the development, management, and storage of test cases.
Test Execution and Reporting Bugs: Manual testers conduct tests after creating all necessary test cases and setting up the test environment. Manual testers must record bug reports using a bug tracking system if they find bugs while testing. Additionally, the bug reports must be thorough and include reproduction instructions, an expected result, an actual result, and any pertinent attachments screenshots, screen recordings, etc. As a result, a developer may accurately identify the bug and swiftly replicate it.
Analysis of Test Results: Manual testers typically do an analysis once testing is finished to get significant parameters that may be helpful in choosing the best course of action and scheduling subsequent tasks. If you utilize one of the numerous test case management systems, it may only need a few clicks.
Why manual testing is preferred over automation in software development?
Manual testing is preferred over automation testing in software development because of the following major reasons:
Human Perspective: Despite the strength of automation techniques, contextual comprehension is a strength of the human brain. Particularly in UI/UX usability testing, manual testers might pick up on variances that automated systems might miss.
Validity of Test Cases: Some test cases, such as determining the responsiveness of mobile devices, are best assessed by manual testers. For such situations, automation might be expensive or less productive.
Veracity of Automated Systems: Sometimes, automated systems might generate incorrect or inaccurate results. By adding an additional level of validation through manual testing, we can be sure that no critical flaws are missed.
Deep Understanding of the Issue: By understanding issues from the perspective of the end user during manual testing, testers can come up with better ideas and solutions. Automated test updates can be time-consuming and expensive. The flexibility of manual testing is greater in such circumstances.
Conclusion
Hence, from the above discussion, we can conclude this blog post by saying that manual testing is the basis of automation testing. Without getting expertise on manual testing, test engineers can’t do automation. The cornerstone of software quality assurance will always be manual testing. Then, what is the prize? A combination of manual and automatic testing. This team ensures a thorough testing strategy, increasing the likelihood that those annoying bugs will be discovered.
As a top service provider of manual testing services, Precise Testing Solution has a team of seasoned professionals who excel at providing thorough manual testing services. We offer our customers trustworthy manual testing services at affordable pricing. To make sure that the software being tested is suitable for use and that there are no performance issues that could impair the product’s usability or effectiveness, Precise Testing Solution offers quality-focused manual testing services.
For more information regarding our manual testing services, visit our website at www.precisetestingsolution.com or call our office @ 0120-3683602.
Also, you can send us an email at info@precisetestingsolution.com
We look forward to helping you!
