Scripted Testing vs. Script-Less Testing – Analyzing the difference

In this blog post, we will look at a full parameter-based comparison of scripted testing vs. script-less testing in order to establish which one is better for doing test automation of any software application, as the requirements of today’s quick delivery needs have not been satisfied by the continuous software evolution, and traditional testing techniques would not be sufficient enough because of the complexity of software applications. 

Scripted Testing vs. Script-less Testing: A Parameter-Based Comparison 

1. Writing Test Scripts:

Each module and feature must have a test script for scripted testing. Depending on the testing framework used, these scripts may be simple or complex. So, if we have a scripting-trained workforce, then we can decide to stick with the scripted testing, but if we don’t have a scripting-trained workforce, then script-less testing may be simpler to begin with for us. So, in this way, script-less testing is a better method as compared to scripted testing. 

2. Coding Language Knowledge:

Scripted testing is carried out by creating scripts in a computer language. Consequently, in this scenario, having solid programming skills becomes essential. The decision in this case is based on the company’s existing status. Since automation testers would cost extra for a new business, script-less testing would definitely be a decent place to start. On the other hand, scripted testing may be a wise choice for a well-established IT company with a large staff of automation testers. So, in this way, script-less testing is a better method as compared to scripted testing. 

3. Test Script Maintenance:

After the execution part of automation test scripts is done, test script maintenance is the work we have to put out to modify them whenever some modifications happen in the application with the introduction of new functionalities. The QA team is more at ease with script-less testing, in which we most likely have to drag and drop items, record them, play them back once, or alter the NLP-based language. 

On the other hand, when software functionality changes, scripted testing can occasionally turn into a nightmare. Along with the module, the automation test script grows excessively complicated over time. Even if the tester is the one who generated these test scripts, it takes time for the tester to comprehend the dependencies and the flow of them. So, in this way, script-less testing is a better method as compared to scripted testing. 

4. Participating Individuals:

Participating individuals in the testing process can result in improvements and better inputs to the testing quality. As the testing is codeless and easy for individuals to participate in, script-less testing wins this round. Participants in script-less testing may come from the management team, the business team, the stakeholders, or even the clients. These individuals can comprehend the testing flow, improvise, and propose modifications in the software application even though they have little knowledge of programming or coding languages. 

On the other hand, everything in scripted testing is written in a programming language. In order to properly comprehend the test scripts and recommend any improvements, individuals cannot be engaged. It can only be done by a team of highly qualified and skilled QA testing professionals. However, the QA testers receive assistance from analysts, managers, and customers in determining the requirements and objectives of the modules. But only the QA team is capable of carrying out the real testing procedure. Hence, script-less testing is a better method as compared to scripted testing in this way. 

5. The Learning Curve:

The amount of work required to learn the testing method from scratch is known as the learning curve. The learning curve for script-less testing is relatively short. Despite the fact that different tools offer various approaches to script-less testing, the documentation is thorough, and the procedure is not overly complicated. 

On the other hand, learning scripted testing requires a lot of practice. The tester must learn a programming language like Java, Python, C#, PHP, etc. from scratch in order to begin the programmed testing. The tester must then be able to apply reasoning using a programming language, because tests that are just written in English will not be acceptable. 

Finally, the tester must select testing software that is compatible with his or her programming language and become familiar with the program’s features. Everything requires time and effort, which results in a steep learning curve. So, in this way, script-less testing is a better method as compared to scripted testing. 

6. Test Creation and Execution:

The time required for test creation and execution in order to provide the final reports As we are all aware, script-less testing does not need sophisticated code and can thus quickly create test cases and produce results. Test design for scripted testing takes time, sometimes days. So, in this way, script-less testing is a better method as compared to scripted testing. 

7. Tool Selection:

This parameter will surely help to decide between scripted testing and script-less testing as to which test automation is better to choose for doing automation testing of any software application. 

Selenium is a fantastic tool to start with for scripted testing, which is a more prevalent technique. It is available in a wide range of languages, so we don’t need to change our approach depending on the application. Selenium is robust, open source, and has a huge community to support us in every way. 

Script-less testing, on the other hand, requires fewer automation tools, but those that are used are highly efficient. These tools use various techniques for creating the tests and maintaining them subsequently. We may find out more about several codeless automation tools and choose the one that fulfills our needs and requirements. 

Conclusion

So, it can be said from the above discussion that both scripted testing and script-less testing are great test automation methods and bring different things to the table. Hence, to choose a test automation approach, one must take into account all of the aforementioned parameters in relation to each other, and depending on the projects, circumstances, and organization, one may choose to divide the work, train the team, or invest extra money. 

For more information, Visit Our Website at www.precisetestingsolution.com 

or call our office @ 0120-3683602  

or you can send us an email at info@precisetestingsolution.com 

We look forward to helping your business grow.